By hannover-web.com **Interview with Bola A. Akinterinwa on the 79th UN General Assembly: Challenges and Intrigues**
**Interviewer:** The 79th session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA) seems to be grappling with numerous organizational challenges. Can you explain how the electoral process for the President of the UNGA works and why this particular session is significant?
**Bola A. Akinterinwa:** Certainly. The 79th UNGA operates under a structured process similar to past assemblies. The election for the President of the General Assembly took place on June 6, 2024. According to the UN’s guidelines, the presidency rotates by region, and this year it fell to Africa, leading to the election of Ambassador Philemon Yang from Cameroon. This aligns with Resolution 71/323, which encourages candidates to articulate their vision and engage in discussions to foster transparency and inclusivity.
**Interviewer:** What can you tell us about the themes and discussions that are happening at this UNGA?
**Bola A. Akinterinwa:** The opening session started on September 10, and we are currently witnessing a series of significant events, including the “Summit of the Future” on September 22, followed by the high-level general debate commencing on September 24. The theme this year is “Leaving no one behind: Acting together for the advancement of peace, sustainable development, and human dignity for present and future generations.” This theme encourages a critical reflection on how we can foster peace and sustainable development in our international relations.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned layers of intrigue at the assembly. What do you see as the main challenges in achieving peace and security through the UN?
**Bola A. Akinterinwa:** Unfortunately, the current atmosphere suggests that many countries are more focused on self-preservation than on sincere commitments to peace. The intrigue often overshadows the collaborative efforts that are vital. Ongoing conflicts, particularly in the Middle East, are compounded by hidden agendas, which ultimately undermine the UN’s ability to fulfill its primary mission of maintaining peace.
**Interviewer:** How would you assess the UN’s effectiveness given the current geopolitical tensions?
**Bola A. Akinterinwa:** The UN functions within a framework that often reinforces existing power dynamics and inequalities, largely due to the veto power held by the permanent five (P-5) nations. This has resulted in inaction when critical interventions are necessary. The ongoing struggles, such as those involving Israel and Palestine, illustrate how the interests of the global community can frequently overshadow humanitarian needs, creating a considerable gap in the UN’s overall effectiveness.
**Interviewer:** It sounds like the veto power poses a significant barrier to reforming the UN. Could you elaborate on its implications?
**Bola A. Akinterinwa:** The veto power establishes an imbalanced system where the five permanent members wield disproportionate control over decision-making. This often obstructs meaningful reform and action against violations of international law, as seen in the context of Israel’s actions in occupied territories. The tension between advocating for peace while simultaneously supplying arms to conflicting parties complicates the UN’s mission.
**Interviewer:** In your view, what might be a way forward to resolve entrenched conflicts like those between Israel and the Palestinians?
**Bola A. Akinterinwa:** Recently, Australia’s Foreign Minister, Penny Wong, suggested that the international community should officially recognize Palestinian statehood with a clear timeline to hold all parties accountable. This approach could urge involved nations to take stronger actions and help bypass the political maneuvering that has historically hindered progress.
**Interviewer:** Finally, with the UNGA theme focusing on inclusivity and development, what are your expectations for the outcomes of this 79th session?
**Bola A. Akinterinwa:** Ultimately, I hope this session will inspire a renewed commitment to tackling systemic injustices and promote a unified approach to global security. However, whether the UN can effectively navigate the complexities of international politics and transcend current intrigues is yet to be seen. The distinction between rhetoric and action is more critical now than ever.
